WELCOME TO AASHAYEIN LAW EDUCATION CENTER

08 Nov 2025

Posted by: Shlok Dwivedi

Analysing the Madhya Pradesh High Court Verdict on the Movie “Haq”

Introduction The film industry frequently encounters legal challenges surrounding creative interpretations of real-life events. A recent instance involved the movie Haq, a production starring Emraan Hashmi and Yami Gautam Dhar. Ahead of its scheduled release, the movie found itself at the centre of a legal controversy when a petition was filed seeking to restrain its exhibition. The petition, filed by Siddiqua Begum, who claims to be the daughter of the late Shah Bano, demanded a ban on the film's release....

Read More
19 Jun 2025

Posted by: Manas Shrivastava

Bharat Shiksha Summit 2025 Focuses on Legal Education Reform

In this case, employees from three statutory corporations—IFC, LIC, and ONGC—were terminated without being given a chance to be heard.  Bhagat Ram challenged his termination in the Orissa High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, and the court ruled in his favour, setting aside the termination. However, when Sunil Kumar and Sukhdev Singh filed similar writ petitions in the Patna High Court and Punjab & Haryana High Court respectively, both their petitions were dismissed. Later, all three employees, along....

Read More
19 Jun 2025

Posted by: Aishwarya Chourasia

Sukhdev Singh vs. Bhagatram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi (1975)

In this case, employees from three statutory corporations—IFC, LIC, and ONGC—were terminated without being given a chance to be heard.  Bhagat Ram challenged his termination in the Orissa High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, and the court ruled in his favour, setting aside the termination. However, when Sunil Kumar and Sukhdev Singh filed similar writ petitions in the Patna High Court and Punjab & Haryana High Court respectively, both their petitions were dismissed. Later, all three employees, along....

Read More
19 Jun 2025

Posted by: Manas Shrivastava

BADSHAH vs. URMILA GODSE (2014) 1 SCC 188

On February 10, 2005, the petitioner and respondent were married at Devgad Temple, Hivargav-Pavsa, following Hindu marriage rituals. After their marriage, they lived together, but while the respondent was pregnant, a woman named Shobha arrived at their home, claiming to be the petitioner’s wife. The petitioner allegedly told the respondent that she must either accept living with Shobha or leave. Choosing to stay due to her pregnancy, the respondent suffered physical and mental abuse. The petitioner questioned the paternity of....

Read More